Judges deciding Trump Org suits on partisan lines
Discover more from 1100 Pennsylvania
Judges deciding Trump Org suits on partisan lines
Judges are ruling along party lines in emoluments, unfair competition, and House investigation suits involving Trump’s businesses
In lawsuits regarding the emoluments clauses, an unfair competition claim, and House committee investigations involving the Trump Organization, judges nominated by Republican presidents have sided with President Donald J. Trump 100 percent of the time when deciding whether to dismiss a case or allow it to proceed. And with just one exception, jurists picked by Democratic presidents have always ruled against Trump on those same matters.
This findings is per 1100 Pennsylvania’s analysis of the cases and investigations it tracks that are related to the president’s businesses.
And based on other journalists’ accounts of oral arguments in two cases currently being reviewed by appeals courts, this partisan trend looks likely to continue. Standard disclaimer that correlation is not causation goes here: _______________.
(Select the table to open a larger version in a browser.)
Four days until a paid subscription is required to receive all new 1100 Pennsylvania issues
Starting July 22, most new issues of 1100 Pennsylvania will be available only to paid subscribers. If you did not pay for a membership when you signed up, you received a separate email with information about subscribing earlier today. If you did pay for a membership, nothing changes and you’ll continue to receive every issue of 1100 Pennsylvania and have full access to the online archives.
Support ad-free, in-depth independent reporting on the conflicts at the Trump Hotel D.C. and the president’s other businesses: select the red button that says “Subscribe now” and choose the $5/month or $50/year option. Thanks!
Unpaid subscribers will continue to receive about one free issue a week.
Campaign expenditures
The Heartland Values PAC, affiliated with Sen. John Thune (R–SD), spent $3,351.75 on April 10 for catering at the D.C. hotel owned by the head of the executive branch and Thune’s party. The charge was the PAC’s first at the Trump Hotel D.C., although Thune’s campaign, Friends of John Thune, has spent $11,016.17 there.
The campaign for Rep. Mike Rogers (R–AL) spent $395 for catering in April and May 2019 at the D.C. hotel owned by the head of the executive branch and Rogers’s party. These charges marked Rogers’s campaign’s first reported expenditures at the Trump Hotel D.C.
The campaign for Rep. Bruce Wasterman (R–AR) spent $384.40 on food in May 2019 at the D.C. hotel owned by the head of the executive branch and Wasterman’s party. These charges marked Wasterman’s campaign’s first reported expenditures at the Trump Hotel D.C.
The campaign for Rep. Robert Aderholt (R–AL) spent $454.50 on May 13, 2019 at the D.C. hotel owned by the head of the executive branch and Aderholt’s party. His campaign has now spent $3,078.79 total at the Trump Hotel D.C.
Notable sightings
A glimpse of the foreign officials, government employees, politicians, lobbyists, and the like who patronize or appear at Trump businesses. Most people shown here have reasons to want to influence the Trump administration, rely on its good graces for their livelihoods, or should be providing oversight. Additionally, high-profile guests serve as draws for paying customers.
This guy’s “parents met the President of the United States on Saturday”—because they were at his Sterling, Virginia golf course
Trump Org EVP Eric Trump accompanied another group of members from one of his U.S. clubs to a European club. This time it was Trump Westchester members visiting Trump Turnberry. Eric’s repeated European junkets with his clients likely cost the U.S. taxpayers money because of his Secret Service protection.
A regional organizer for a political party in a foreign country, Jeffrey Griese of the British Columbia Conservative Party, received a warm welcome at the U.S. president’s D.C. hotel.
An intern for Rep. Dave Brat (R–VA), Ian Frith, celebrated his dear mother’s birthday at the hotel owned by the head of the executive branch.
The night before testifying to the U.S. Senate about how social-media companies suppress conservative voices, conservative radio talk show host Dennis Prager was at the Trump Hotel D.C.
Looking for work as a lobbyist, Jennifer Perez visited the president’s D.C. hotel—with an attorney/advisor for the Social Security Administration, C. Uhlan Brock.
Patrick Brenner, the director of development for a conservative think tank, the Rio Grande Foundation, brought his family to the U.S. president’s D.C. hotel.
“Founder and servant of Christ at John 8:32—The Truth Will Set You Free” ministry Carli Eli, had her plandid taken departing the Trump Hotel D.C. It’s now her Facebook profile photo too.
Other Trump Organization news
“The November 1992 tape in the NBC archives shows Donald Trump partying with Jeffrey Epstein at Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate, now a private club, more than a decade before Epstein pleaded guilty to felony prostitution charges in Florida. At one point in the video, Trump is seen grabbing a woman towards him and patting her behind.” By Jack Bohrer for NBC News.
“Prosecutors reveal details from Michael Cohen investigation” by Rebecca Ballhaus for The Wall Street Journal
“Question remains: When will Open return to Trump Turnberry?” by Rex Hoggard for The Golf Channel
Trump Org EVP Eric Trump repeated his father’s racist message:
House investigations (latest change July 12, 2019)
Financial Services
The committee sent a inquiry to Deutsche Bank AG on its ties to Trump, according to the bank on Jan. 24. On March 1, Chair Rep. Maxine Waters (D–CA) said the bank is cooperating with her committee and that her staffers met with bank employees. On March 11, the committee requested documents on Trump’s businesses from Capital One; the bank said it was preserving documents but needed a subpoena to comply per Politico. On April 15, that subpoena was issued. The committee reportedly has subpoenaed nine banks for information about the president’s finances. President Trump, Don Jr., Eric, Ivanka, and their businesses sued Deutsche Bank and Capital One on April 30 to prevent them from sharing records with Congress. Deutsche Bank reportedly has been willing to cooperate with lawmakers. On May 3, the Trumps filed for a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas. But U.S. District Court Judge Edgardo Ramos (an Obama appointee) declined to issue that injunction on May 22, saying that the financial institutions can comply with the lawmakers’ request. The Trumps’ appealed that ruling on May 24. The lawmakers and Trumps agreed to refrain from enforcing the subpoenas until after the appellate court rules. The court announced it will expedite the briefing process, to end on July 18. Oral arguments are scheduled for Aug. 23.
Foreign Affairs
Chair Elliot Engel (D–NY) “plans to investigate whether President Donald Trump’s businesses are driving foreign policy decisions, including whether Trump violated the emoluments clause of the Constitution in the process” per CNN on Jan. 23.
Judiciary
On March 4, the committee “served document requests to 81 agencies, entities, and individuals believed to have information relevant to the investigation. Among the individuals the committee requested documents from are Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, Trump Org EVP and COO Michael Calamari, CFO Alan Weisselberg, EVP and chief legal officer Alan Garten, Trump tax attorney Sherri Dillon, longtime Trump executive assistant Rhona Graff, former Trump advisor Felix Sater (whom it interviewed on March 21), former Trump attorney Michael Cohen, and Trump associate and inaugural chair Tom Barrack. The committee received “tens of thousands” of documents by its March 18 deadline, according to its chair, Jerry Nadler (D–NY). Among the respondents: Barrack, Steve Bannon, and the National Rifle Association. But more than half of the targets still had not replied by April 3. On that day, the committee authorized subpoenas for former White House aides Bannon, Ann Donaldson, Hope Hicks, Donald McGahn, and Reince Priebus, per Politico. And on May 21, the committee did in fact subpoena Hicks and Donaldson. Attorneys for the Trump Organization, Don Jr., and Eric did not respond to Politico’s inquires if their clients planned to reply. The committee is considering making additional document requests, including to Trump’s personal attorney Rudy Giuliani.
Intelligence
On Feb. 6, Chair Adam Schiff (D–CA) said his committee would investigate links or coordination between the Russian government/foreign actors and individuals associated with Trump’s businesses, as well as if foreign actors sought to compromise or hold leverage over Trump’s businesses. Schiff hired a prosecutor experienced in combating Russian organized crime to lead the investigation.
On Feb. 10, Schiff said the committee would investigate Trump’s relationship with Deutsche Bank, a major lender to the Trump Organization. On Jan. 24, the committee sent an inquiry to Deutsche Bank AG on its ties to Trump. On Feb. 28, an aide said the panel expects to interview Trump Org. CFO Allen Weisselberg.
During testimony on March 6, Michael Cohen turned over documents that allegedly show how Trump’s then-personal lawyer, Jay Sekulow, edited Cohen’s statement regarding Trump Tower Moscow. Cohen later read this revised statement before the House and Senate Intelligence Committees. In closed-door testimony in March, Cohen claimed the president submitted a false insurance claim regarding a fresco in Trump Tower. On July 9, Felix Sater testified but “refus[ed] to address whether he knew that the president’s former lawyer, Michael Cohen, planned to lie under oath about a failed Trump Tower project in Moscow,” The Washington Post reported. Georgian-American businessman Giorgi Rtskhiladze also discussed his Trump Tower Moscow proposal with the committee on June 26.
The committee seeks to interview inauguration organizer Stephanie Winston Wolkoff.
On March 11, the committee requested documents on Trump’s businesses from Capital One; the bank “said it was already preserving documents but needs a subpoena in order to comply” per Politico. On April 15, that subpoena was issued. All told, the committee reportedly has subpoenaed nine banks for information about President Trump’s finances. President Trump, Don. Jr., Eric, Ivanka, and their businesses sued Deutsche Bank and Capital One on April 30, however, to prevent them from sharing financial records with Congress. Schiff said Deutsche Bank has been willing to cooperate with lawmakers. On May 3, the Trumps filed for a preliminary injunction to block the subpoenas. But U.S. District Court Judge Edgardo Ramos (an Obama appointee) declined to issue that injunction on May 22, saying that the financial institutions can comply with the lawmakers’ request. The Trumps’ appealed that ruling on May 24. The lawmakers and Trumps agreed to refrain from enforcing the subpoenas until after the appellate court rules. The court announced it will expedite the briefing process to end on July 18. Oral arguments are scheduled for Aug. 23.
Oversight and Reform
Chair Elijah Cummings’s (D–MD) staff “sent out 51 letters to government officials, the White House, and the Trump Organization asking for documents related to investigations that the committee may launch,” on Jan. 13. In a Feb. 15 letter to White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, Cummings said the committee received documents showing White House attorney Stefan Passantino and long-time Trump personal attorney Sheri Dillon provided “false information” to the Office of Government Ethics regarding Michael Cohen’s “hush-money payments.” As a result, Cummings wants to depose Passantino and Dillon; the White House, however, rejected Cummings’ request to interview Passantino. And on Feb. 27, Cohen testified to the committee about those payments and other Trump Organization business practices, which could lead to allegations of possible insurance fraud. The next day, House Democrats signaled they would seek testimony from Trump Organization officials whom Cohen alleged were implicated, including Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, and CFO Allen Weisselberg.
On March 6, Cummings requested information from GSA about its reversal of a decision to relocate FBI headquarters, which is across the street from the Trump Hotel D.C. On April 12 Cummings wrote to the GSA again, this time requesting all monthly reports from the hotel, information about liens on the hotel, correspondence between the Trump Org and GSA, and legal opinions regarding the Trump Org’s compliance with the lease. Cummings gave an April 26 deadline; GSA failed to meet it, citing confidentiality concerns. Cummings threatened to issue a subpoena.
The committee also has requested 10 years of Trump’s financial records. On March 11, the committee requested documents on Trump’s businesses from Capital One; the bank “said it was already preserving documents but needs a subpoena in order to comply” per Politico. On April 12, Cummings notified committee members that he plans to subpoena Mazars USA, Trump’s accounting firm, for his financial statements. President Trump, the Trump Organization, and the Trump Hotel D.C. sued Cummings and Mazars USA on April 22 in an attempt to prevent the release of the records. Cummings postponed the subpoenas’ deadline while the courts addresses the president’s suit. On May 20, U.S. District Judge Amit P. Mehta (an Obama appointee) denied the president’s motion. Trump appealed the next day and two days after that, the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals’ judges fast tracked the case, with oral arguments he;d on July 12. After the hearing. Politico’s Josh Gerstein predicted the judges would vote 2-1 against Trump—David Tatel (a Clinton appointee) and Patricia Millett (an Obama appointee) seemed to side with the lawmakers, while Neomi Rao (a Trump appointee) seemed partial to Trump. In a filing on June 10, Trump’s attorneys argued that the committee’s subpoena was invalid because “it is an effort to investigate alleged legal violations—power that is vested in the executive, not Congress.”
Transportation and Infrastructure subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management
Transportation committee Chair Peter DeFazio (D–OR) and subcommittee Chair Dina Titus (D–NV) sent a letter to GSA administrator Emily Murphy on Jan. 22 asking for all communication between the GSA and members of the Trump family dating back to 2015, an explanation of how the D.C. hotel calculates its profits, profit statements since the hotel opened, any guidance from the White House regarding the lease, and whether or not Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner are recused from participating in decisions regarding the property. GSA has “sent a partial response and the subcommittee is reviewing it,” according to a senior House staffer familiar with the situation. When hearings begin, it is likely that Murphy will be the first person called to testify, according to a person familiar with the subcommittee’s plans. Titus is hiring additional staffers to handle the investigation.
On March 6, Titus requested information from GSA about its reversal of a decision to relocate FBI headquarters, which is across the street from the Trump Hotel D.C. NPR reported “Democrats on the committee want to know, among other things, whether there was any political pressure exerted on the GSA by the Trump White House, presidential campaign or transition team. They also want to know how the Trump Hotel calculates its profits, segregates incoming money from foreign governments, and what the Trump Organization owes the GSA on a monthly or annual basis.’”
Ways and Means
On April 3, Chair Richard Neal (D–MA) requested six years of Trump’s personal tax returns and the returns for eight of his businesses (including that of the trust that holds the president’s stake in the D.C. hotel). After the IRS missed Neal’s deadline and then an extension, Treasury Sec. Steve Mnuchin said he’d make a decision whether or not to release the returns by May 6. He declined to do so. On May 10, the committee subpoenaed Mnuchin and IRS commissioner Charles Rettig, giving them a May 17 deadline to turn over Trump’s tax returns. Mnuchin again declined to comply. Neal suspected he’d know his next move by May 24, but earlier he had indicated he’ll take the issue to the federal courts. On July 3, the committee sued the IRS for the returns.
The Oversight subcommittee held a hearing on “legislative proposals and tax law related to presidential and vice-presidential tax returns” on Feb. 7. “We will ask the question: Does the public have a need to know that a person seeking the highest office in our country obeys tax law?” said Chair John Lewis (D–GA). Tax law experts testified.
Lawsuits (latest change July 16, 2019)
D.C. and MD attorneys general’s emoluments lawsuit
District court docket, appellate court docket
Official capacity—On Dec. 20, 2018, the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled it would hear the president’s appeal of U.S. District Court Judge Peter Messitte’s (a Clinton appointee) rulings that allowed the case to proceed to discovery. The appellate court halted discovery in the case. Discovery had started Dec. 3 and was scheduled to run through Aug. 2, 2019, with Maryland AG Brian Frosh (D) and D.C. AG Karl Racine (D) having subpoenaed the Trump Organization, including its Scottish golf courses; the U.S. Departments of Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, and Treasury and the GSA; and the state of Maine. On July 10 the three appellate judges—Paul Niemeyer (a George H.W. Bush appointee), Dennis Shedd (a George W. Bush appointee), and A. Marvin Quattlebaum (a Trump appointee)—ruled unanimously in President Trump’s favor and dismissed the suit, finding that the AGs did not have standing. Frosh and Racine said they would continue to pursue their options.
Individual capacity—On Dec. 14, Trump’s personal attorneys appealed the denial of their motion to dismiss the case to the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. On Dec. 19, the AGs replied to Trump’s motion for a stay pending that appeal by dismissing the claims against him in his “individual capacity to allow the claims against President Trump in his official capacity to move forward expeditiously.” (The AGs brought suit against Trump in his individual capacity after Messite suggested they do so.) Trump’s attorneys, on Dec. 21, opposed the motion to dismiss at the district level, saying the appeals court now has jurisdiction and accused the AGs of “gamesmanship.” On July 10, the appeals court dismissed this case, ruling the AGs did not have standing to bring the suit. Frosh and Racine said they would continue to pursue their options.
Democratic senators, representatives’ emoluments lawsuit
On Sept. 28, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan (a Clinton appointee) ruled that the legislators have standing to sue. Trump’s Justice Department attorneys filed an interlocutory appeal on Oct. 22. On Jan. 30, 2019, the plaintiffs’ filed a notice of supplemental authority, notifying the court of the GSA inspector general’s report that criticized GSA for failing to consider if the Trump Hotel D.C.’s lease was in compliance with the Constitution after Trump became president. Two days later, the president’s attorneys argued that the IG’s conclusion was not inconsistent with Trump’s argument, but that the judge should ignore that report anyway because the IG has no expertise in interpreting or applying the foreign emoluments clause. On April 30, Sullivan denied Trump’s motion to dismiss the suit. While the president’s attorneys have a supplemental brief due on May 28, on May 14 they filed a motion to stay the proceedings while they appeal Sullivan’s decision. A week later, the lawmakers opposed that motion. On June 25, Sullivan denied Trump’s motion to stay the proceedings pending appeal, paving the way for discovery to begin June 28 and last through Sept. 27. On July 8, the president’s DoJ attorneys notified the court that they will appeal its refusal to dismiss the case to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit. According to Trump’s filing, the Democrats have issued 37 subpoenas, which require responses by July 29. The subpoenas “target information from a wide array of Trump’s businesses, including Trump Tower, his hotels in New York and Washington, and his Mar-a-Lago Club in South Florida, according to the constitutional Accountability Center, the legal group representing the Democrats in the case,” reported The Washington Post.
CREW et. al’s emoluments lawsuit
District court docket, appellate court docket
On December 21, 2017, U.S. District Court Judge George Daniels (a Clinton appointee) dismissed this suit, saying CREW lacked standing. In February 2018, CREW appealed to the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. Oral arguments on that motion were held on Oct. 30, 2018 before U.S. Circuit Court Judges John Walker Jr., (a George H.W. Bush appointee), Pierre Leval (a Clinton appointee), and Christopher Droney (an Obama appointee).
Cork’s unfair competition lawsuit
District court docket, appellate court docket
U.S. District Court Judge Richard J. Leon (a George W. Bush appointee) dismissed the case on Nov. 26, 2018, writing “Cork has failed to state a claim for unfair competition under D.C. law.” On Dec. 10, Cork’s attorneys filed a notice of appeal and on Jan. 10, 2019 they submitted a statement of issues to be raised. Cork filed its first appellant brief on May 15, arguing “the District Court failed to recognize the evolving nature of the common law of unfair competition in the District of Columbia and erroneously treated the prior cases as if they were a series of statutes that Appellant had to satisfy to state a claim.” Attorneys for the president and his hotel requested a 31-day extension for filing their brief, with Cork’s consent, which the court granted on May 28. On July 15, Trump’s attorneys replied, arguing “Cork’s amended complaint fails to state a claim under well-settled D.C. tort law.” Cork’s response is due Aug. 5.
Employees’ class-action suit alleging racial discrimination
D.C. superior court (direct link not available, search for case 2017 CA 006517 B)
Two of the three plaintiffs did not appear at a status hearing on Jan. 25, 2019; their cases were moved to arbitration. Via email, their attorney, A.J. Dhali, said his clients did not appear because their case already had been moved to arbitration last year. The next status hearing is scheduled for Oct. 4.
Thanks for reading! If you like what you saw, tell someone. If you’ve been forwarded this newsletter, subscribe at zacheverson.substack.com. Questions? Read our FAQ/manifesto. Tips or feedback? Contact Zach Everson securely at 1100Pennsylvania@protonmail.com or via Signal/SMS/mobile at 202.804.2744.
Judges deciding Trump Org suits on partisan lines
Good scoop!